<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Principle 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://glennbeckreport.com/the-9-principles-deconstructed/principle-3/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://glennbeckreport.com</link>
	<description>Deconstructing Glenn Beck Lies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2012 22:04:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwampOgre</title>
		<link>http://glennbeckreport.com/the-9-principles-deconstructed/principle-3/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>SwampOgre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:30:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://glennbeckreport.com/?page_id=114#comment-23</guid>
		<description>3. Trying to be more honest means actually doing it, not just becoming an ever more skillful bullshitter and self-deluded psycho. This might be a place to plug a recent book by a philosophy prof. I think he used that vulgar term in the title to describe a new truth-functional status. In elementary logic, a statement can be true or false. A statement could be false because of an honest mistake, or because of a lie in which the statement is made with the awareness that it&#039;s a lie. A third status is that a statement is made not because it&#039;s true or because it&#039;s a deliberate lie, but because the speaker/writer doesn&#039;t CARE whether it&#039;s true or false, and only cares whether it is PERSUASIVE. The good prof used the term bullshit to describe this logical status. It&#039;s very common in politics and unfortunately also common in the commentary sold as news. Factual commentary good, lies and BS bad. Beck is such a dodger and weaver concerning the facts he doesn&#039;t want to admit, and his frame of reference is very often false.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>3. Trying to be more honest means actually doing it, not just becoming an ever more skillful bullshitter and self-deluded psycho. This might be a place to plug a recent book by a philosophy prof. I think he used that vulgar term in the title to describe a new truth-functional status. In elementary logic, a statement can be true or false. A statement could be false because of an honest mistake, or because of a lie in which the statement is made with the awareness that it&#8217;s a lie. A third status is that a statement is made not because it&#8217;s true or because it&#8217;s a deliberate lie, but because the speaker/writer doesn&#8217;t CARE whether it&#8217;s true or false, and only cares whether it is PERSUASIVE. The good prof used the term bullshit to describe this logical status. It&#8217;s very common in politics and unfortunately also common in the commentary sold as news. Factual commentary good, lies and BS bad. Beck is such a dodger and weaver concerning the facts he doesn&#8217;t want to admit, and his frame of reference is very often false.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

