Glenn Beck Lies
Last update 2/7/10
11/16/09 Apture is working GREAT as a way to easily use an Excel spreadsheet in a web page. I would highly recommend it! The documentation is a hard to navigate but once you get started it’s very quick and easy. I may use it to link to some other content; I’m starting to see more of this on the web.
JUST A REMINDER….
This page needs A LOT of work, and YOU CAN HELP. If you know of a Glenn Beck lie that’s not already debunked here, or have an assertion he made that you want fact-checked, please let me know! You can use the comments or if you prefer, email them to me. wexler@glennbeckreport.com
Glenn Beck rants about “czars”
WTF, are you people RETARDED or what? “Czars” are not nameless people with secret powers who operate behind the scenes to implement a secret agenda. The title was coined by the press, who find it easier to say things like “Money Czar” than “Head of Office of Management and Budget”.
What is wrong with you if you believe Glenn Beck when he tells you that these are like the communist Czars and there’s a socialist agenda and this proves it? I’ll tell you what’s wrong, you’re CRACKED.
Please get an effing clue, OK? For crissakes there have been “czars” around in the US ever since the press got lazy, which also happens to coincide with when our country started going to the dogs… DURING THE TERM OF RONALD REAGAN WHO APPOINTED THE FIRST DRUG CZAR, OR MAYBE RICHARD EFFING NIXON WHO APPOINTED THE FIRST ENERGY CZAR.
Free clue. Re-read the previous paragraph before posting to me.
Glenn Beck lies about global warming
I mean, you don’t have to be a socialist, I guess, to believe in global warming. It’s just that almost everyone who does believe in global warming is a socialist. I mean, believes in manmade global warming that now can be fixed and reversed or whatever.
Glenn Beck radio show, January 12, 2009
Glenn Beck Claims Obama favors reparations through health care reform
Obama is against direct reparations for one reason. He doesn’t ever want the victim card to be lost. In 2004 he wrote, “I fear that reparations would be an excuse for some to say we’ve paid our debt and then avoid the much harder work.” What is the harder work? What is the harder work? You don’t want the debt paid because you don’t ever want the leverage gone. The debt can never be paid. Instead he has a better idea. Universal healthcare and that’s just the beginning. That’s only one piece. Universal healthcare.
Glenn Beck radio show, July 23, 2009
Glenn Beck claims that Van Jones is a Communist Black Nationalist
The green movement, how come his green jobs czar is a black nationalist? A communist black nationalist. A black nationalist again is the same kind of thinking of Jeremiah Wright. What does that have to do with green jobs? How was he a black nationalist militant, become communist, anarchist and then find the eco movement and then say this is the job for me? Because the green jobs czar isn’t concerned about the planet. He’s concerned about reparations.
Glenn Beck radio show, July 23, 2009
You should put the Glenn Beck crying videos on here =P
p0t
27 Oct 09 at 7:57 am
Ha ha your a tool and your attempt to discredit anyone is futile.
wanksta
27 Oct 09 at 8:27 am
Look, wanker, I hate to be disagreeable but I have to say that I actually am discrediting Beck already.
If you examine the small collection of lies I’ve accumulated to date it’s quite obvious that I’ve established a few things. First, Glenn Beck is delusional or is portraying someone who is delusional. His conspiracy theories don’t stand to the slightest examination, as they are full of logical leaps, stunning outright lies, and John Bircher dogma. Second, Glenn Beck is a phony. Look at his Vapo-Rub crying. Look at his phony Mormonism, which is disgusting to real Mormons unless they share his Cleon Skousen crapology.
I guess anyone who would post “your a tool” is too vapidly mind-numbed to even understand a word of this post, so I’m posting this to others who follow this site.
You can have your own opinions (“your a tool”) but you can’t have your own facts (“attempt to discredit anyone is futile”). No, it’s not futile, it actually exists, the discredit is real, and it’s being propagated through our culture.
If only basic English could be propagated through your thick skull.
admin
27 Oct 09 at 8:55 am
Wanksta, 2003 called and 50 Cent wants his song title back.
p0t
27 Oct 09 at 9:12 am
[...] may check back often to my page Glenn Beck Lies, where I will debunk his statements with the plain truth, an element that is completely lacking [...]
Beck’s claims of never being debunked debunked | The Glenn Beck Report
27 Oct 09 at 7:01 pm
You obviously fail to do your homework though i doubt this reply will stay up long… Wilson and the FDR era was the firsts to coin the term Czar not the media being lazy see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Czar_(political_term) which is exactly what the position still is today – someone apointed not elected into power Obama isn’t doing anything that Bush wasn’t doing he is simply doing it faster – I never knew the hope and change you left wing nut jobs were hoping for was bush on steroids.
“Glenn Beck claims that Van Jones is a Communist Black Nationalist” – Van Jones in his own words explained that he has come to the realization that as a more effective means an end use less extreme actions aka the green movement to push his extreme fundamentals. thats not a GB quote its Van Jones himself…
Honestly, I admire what you are trying to do here I’d just suggest instead of generic slandering try to fight specific facts with facts Example – Beck pointed out Anita Dunn’s Mao reference to which she responded she was “just kidding” so to disprove the ‘just a joke’ theory he dug up another Anita Dunn quote to make it quite clear she was being serious. All I see here is some misguided info on czars and a few beck quotes that have no furhter thought (though i guess you are saying it should stand out for itself?) likewise Anita’s “just kidding” response was a laughable defense to her first Mao love reference… beck pulling up more ammo was just the final nails in the coffin – the same approach he used on Van Jones
Derrick
27 Oct 09 at 10:17 pm
Who coined the term “czar” is not relevant to the argument of what it actually means, but since you want to go there I will entertain your distraction for a moment. The government is filled with appointed officials who serve at the pleasure of the President. This is a political fact that has resulted in criminals being placed into very high positions. Who started it or who coined it has no effect whatsoever on what it is. Consider Bernie Kerik for example, who was Guilianni’s Chief of Police and could have been appointed “Homeland Security Czar” if it weren’t for the crimes that came out during his congressional approval process. Now it’s true that this is a cabinet position so congress had oversight. But nonetheless, it was a purely political appointment, such as putting Mike Brown as “FEMA Czar”, or Undersecretary of Emergency Preparedness and Response. You see, the fact that RWNJ like yourself don’t “get” is that “czar” is a reference to socialism that doesn’t last long in full daylight. There is no socialism connection for the usage of the term, and if you even had a couple of firing synapses you would know that the “Czar” of Russia was not a socialist at all. The Czars were imperialist royalty, you silly little boy. So you see, you’re peeing your diapers all about something that doesn’t even exist, except as the delusion held forward by monkey children like yourself who can’t hold up their end of a political discussion with a crutch.
Glenn Beck quote on Van Jones from his 9/9/09 radio show:
Beck CLEARLY calls Jones a communist black nationalist. He’s talking about Gibbs’ statement on Jones’ resignation. Now as I have updated EARLIER today, Jones was a member of STORM, which dissolved in 2002. He released a book in 2008 which contains clearly capitalist ideas. So please spare yourself from trying to look like an authority on some topic and then just coming off like a chump.
You seem to be laboring under the misconception that Beck nailed Anita Dunn. Please RE-READ the material on my website regarding this misconception. Dunn was interim WH Communications Director and was scheduled to leave at the end of this year BEFORE the truth was let out about Faux News. Beck had nothing to do with it.
I agree with you that some of the Obama Administration members have been sloppy in what they’ve said. However, that doesn’t make them Maoists. You pointing it out doesn’t make you brilliant, either. It just makes you someone who is paying attention, which is why I will leave your comment up. I admire people who pay attention, and you are welcome to comment here, even though I will probably disagree with you about your conclusions. Especially if they are about anything having to do with my research methods. Shit, I have a life outside this website, I have things I HAVE to do. If I believe something is substantiated, it gets put up. I don’t have time to parse words, that’s for a few WONKs that end up in cadres.
If you would like to HELP me with this project, I can use all the help I can get. Email me your thoughts at wexler@glennbeckreport.com or continue to post.
admin
28 Oct 09 at 7:37 am
To me it seems as though the title is not the problem to begin with. I don’t care if you call them czars, or secial envoys’ or whatever you want. The issue lies with the President surrounding himself with radicals. he said during his campain that if you want to know about him look at those he surrounds himself with. We are seeing them. Not a pretty thing. Before name calling how about we exercize the skill of active listening not just hearing. There is a difference and if you cannot figure out what meakes listening and hearing different, I feel sorry for you.
JeremyPRrep
28 Oct 09 at 8:51 am
I agree with you 100% that the title isn’t the problem. The reason why it made it onto my website is that Glenn Beck has made it a problem by phony scaremongering. Glenn Beck has tried to conjure up phantoms of socialism from the term “czar” because it’s associated with Russia. What Beck does not tell you is that a “czar” was anything BUT socialist. Czars had imperial power and that authoritarian, imperialist rule is RIGHT WING, not socialist.
Now we go on to disagreements. You say that Obama has surrounded himself with radicals. I say that’s a lie. Presidents get to appoint people to positions of power, and they have real titles and real job descriptions. I laugh when Beck or anyone calls Obama’s appointees “radicals”. Look, even Van Jones, who was a member of STORM, a commie front group, wasn’t “radical” by the time Obama appointed him. People can change their politics. Beck has made a lot of noise about Anita Dunn and Ron Bloom being “Maoists” because they mentioned Mao in a speech. WTF? Does that make you a Maoist, to say that Mao got something right once in a while? How close-minded do you get?
This brings me to your last topic, hearing/listening. As a proud socialist I can tell you that your side does a pretty bad job of hearing/comprehending. You, as a group, are very poor critical thinkers who take the most asinine mumbo-jumbo from people like Beck and Limbaugh and think you are being “educated” about government and politics. Puh-LEEESE. Get a book, sit down, read something once in a while. Glenn Beck is a high school graduate dry drunk shock jock who joined up with the Mormons so he could network with their money machine. He’s a uninformed as you can get. He has guests on his show who are total cranks, wankers, and shills for corporate interests. So please, please, PLEASE try to develop some critical listening skills.
By the way, the reason why I don’t defend Obama as a general rule on this website is that I didn’t vote for him. So if you make anti-Obama comments I really don’t care, as long as I think they have merit. Saying that he’s surrounding himself with radicals doesn’t have merit. I know radicals, and I’m not seeing them in government.
Thanks for your comment, Jeremy.
admin
28 Oct 09 at 10:02 am
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by twocrowseeing: RT @stopbeck: RT @WWWexler: Glenn Beck Lies – http://bit.ly/2FdXT8 – Added an embedded spreadsheet, baby steps! #glennbeck #teaparty…
uberVU - social comments
29 Oct 09 at 8:00 am
Actually Derrick your own link states it was the New York Times in 1926 that first used the term Czar. Nowhere in your link does it say where and who used the term Czar for Baruch.
Bob Ross
23 Nov 09 at 3:20 pm
What is truly mindless about Beck and what I presume must be his low IQ undereducated listeners is that Czar does not refer to a communist or a socialist. A Czar is was a monarch.
This may seem like a small point but it is not. it indicates that the people making arguments against Czars? in government (who have no legislative power)are fools.
I have also heard the Glenn Beck crowd, ignorant as they are, make a connection between Czar and Caesar.
So, we are dealing with people who are sentimental, superstitious, and stupid.
Stonry Curtis
10 Jan 10 at 2:03 am
I would feel sorry for some of them, as some are so ignorant, but they’re so damned nasty that it’s hard. Also, all I have to do is think about what’s gone on in this nation for the last 30 years, and the last 8 in particular, to snap myself out of it.
We’re in a mess, and the selective amnesia of how we got here is truly astounding. A lot of them are getting their backs up about Big Government and Big Brother stuff, I want to know where the hell were they when the Bush Administration took away habeas corpus, the 4th Amendment, pissed on their duty to obey any law, either Constitutional or code? Where were these Constitution-wagging idiots when Bush called it “just a piece of paper”? Where?
If you want to find out first hand, you should get yourself an account over at the 9.12 Project website and start asking them. I can’t tell if Glenn Beck has any direct control over the site; however, it is his “project” and the site operator is cherry-picking news that makes Obama and Democrats look bad. Not that there isn’t some validity to it; I am no great fan of Obama, but our system isn’t a monarchy and we have become hugely over-focused on the Presidency. We ought to be working to curtail the Executive Branch overreach, but we have to clean up Congress, too.
I think some of the people at 9.12 are serious-minded folks who have run out of places to turn. I can’t blame them for that; I used to think that all we had to do was elect enough Democrats and everything would be fine. WTF was I thinking? The Dems are just a kinder, gentler brand of corruption. So I understand everyone’s frustration, and I understand how Beck’s over-simplification of complex problems appeals to those who are in fear and are too busy or too stupid to pay attention. So to those people at 9.12, I say this: try to do some critical examination of what Beck is actually saying. Write down the facts he asserts and check them. Try to understand how he makes huge leaps of logic and reaches conclusions that are 100% bogus. Watch his guest list carefully; see how many of them have peer respect and you’ll find that he has lined up (largely) a bunch of lying crackpots.
Well, thanks for your post, SC.
admin
10 Jan 10 at 9:56 am
admin….you are wasting your time and energy.
Everything you have listed here as “lies” some believe are difference in “opinion” I say it is truth!
LMAO=at you!
Joan
29 Jan 10 at 6:27 pm
Really, Joan, you are a pathetic person. You honestly don’t know the difference between a = and a @ sign, do you?
What kind of a moron do you have to be to create the post you just laid like a rotting turd on my doorstep? The kind of moron that says “Neener neener neener”, that’s what kind.
You fail to rebut any one of the lies that I have PROVEN Beck told. That’s PROVEN, not IN MY OPINION. All you can say is that you believe them.
That makes you not only a subject for ridicule, but also a Becktard.
I can’t keep up with Beck’s lies so I haven’t updated this in a while, but when I do, I’m sure it will double in size from last November. That means you will be twice as much of a fukkin’ idiot than you are already. You’re just a bundle of joy, Joan, I’ll bet your mom would be really proud if she knew she popped out one of the lowest life forms on the planet. Is your father even human?
-Wexler
admin
30 Jan 10 at 3:13 pm
This is lame. Even if these were not marginal on the truth-o-meter, there are so few listed as to be laughable. Beck is on every day with that many ops for failure. Is this all you can produce?
Lamo.
Donkeyhotay
1 Feb 10 at 11:54 am
Actually, I haven’t had time to update the site since Thanksgiving due to none of your fucking business.
But I will tell you that each one of those lies are debunked with facts, and if you don’t believe it you are living in an alternate universe.
What’s really “Lamo” is your term “Lamo”. Are you trying to speak fake Spanish or something?
Never mind, why don’t you just snuggle back in with your Mormon fuck Glenn Beck, who, despite your existence, still maintains the crown of King of Fools. But keep trying, he’s going down sooner than you could ever imagine… stay tuned. I’ve heard things that will blow your mind. (In your case, small blow).
admin
1 Feb 10 at 7:52 pm
I was referred to this site by a friend. He made a comment about Glenn Beck being a liar among other things, which I have heard many people say. I have also heard many people speak in support of Glenn Beck. So over the past couple of days (not long enough to form an opinion) I have been researching him, his political views, reading sites against him and sites in favor of him, watching episodes of his show etc. Although I do have my own ideas about this particular issue (communist czars etc), I am going to refrain from posting them on your site, as it seems that anyone who doesn’t share your opinions gets blown-off and called an mindless idiot and such. I think its great what you are doing, however. I strongly believe that more people ( whatever they believe and whomever they support) should try to post facts etc. defending them, and attempt to inform the rest of society. We cannot rely on the media, nor most websites, to tell us the truth. Its all about comparisons and taking into consideration what people with opposing viewpoints have to say. A couple of these people did though deserve to be flamed, their comments were just plain insults. One final comment, @Stonry Curtis: “I have also heard the Glenn Beck crowd, ignorant as they are, make a connection between Czar and Caesar.” …the word Czar (or Tzar) is derived from the name Caesar, as was the word Kaiser (German) as well as the Norse king, Kjárr.
Jinx W
16 Feb 10 at 12:13 pm
Yikes! Bully for you for being able to watch his shows! I can barely stand to watch the clips.
Look, I’m sorry you feel that way about posting something contrary to what you think I might like. The people who I’ve flamed here wrote things to me that they deserved to be flamed for. I’m not inclined to just beat people over the head.
I haven’t been writing on this site much due to poor health. I have been meaning to write my next article in the series on Glenn Beck’s battle for the soul of the TeaBaggers. If you have spent much time looking around on my little poorly-maintained corner of the internet, you may have gathered that I have little patience for blatant exaggeration, selective quoting and memory loss, character assassination by innuendo, and outright lies. Those are just a few of the things you will find packed into every 15 minutes of every Glenn Beck show.
Some people like to be lied to for entertainment. I guess if someone keeps telling you that your fucked-up fantasy world is the real world, on some level it becomes real, or more real, at least for you. That would describe the typical Beckerhead fucktard. If a giant vacuum cleaner came out of outer space and sucked up Glenn Beck and all his fans, it would be a net gain for America and the world.
Thanks for your comment, I promise I will not flame you, at least not very much.
Wexler
admin
16 Feb 10 at 5:46 pm
You seem to have a real hearty hatred for Glenn Beck. I watch his show from time to time and he has repeatedly stated that you should not take his word on any of it but rather, do your own research. I don’t take anybody’s word for it these days so I have looked into many of his statements. Looking at yours as well and it appears that you have simply given your opinion on many of the “Debunkings” I noticed that you are a self avowed socialist (see your own statement above) I don’t expect too many socialists to agree with Glenn Beck on anything. I do however expect that the constitution is upheld as it was originally written. It is not up for “reinterpretation” as many would suggest. If you were to actually watch a couple of Glenn Beck episodes, You too would hear him say repeatedly “Check it out for yourself – Do your own research”
Rob
26 Feb 10 at 12:49 pm
Actually, it’s difficult to watch an ass-clown with his head exploding day after day whose primary purpose in life is to make money by spreading outright lies, crackpot conspiracy theories, and innuendo. You know, stuff like Obama is going to arm AmeriCorps with a budget bigger than the Pentagon budget and use them as his private secret police force. Or that OnStar is a government plot to spy on you. Or that Van Jones is a Black Nationalist who spent time in prison. You know, those kind of lies.
I already do my research, I don’t need Glenn Beck telling me to do it. If anything, he should stop CLAIMING he does all of his own research because he’s a liar. Nobody there bothers to do any research that’s not directly related to information that could be construed to smear Obama or somebody in his administration. Beck has misstated so many facts on his show that I can’t keep up with him. I usually do a fact check on his lies about once a month and update my spreadsheet. What’s really funny, though, is when he adopts his professorial posture with the glasses, the chalkboard, and the pile of big books he claims to have read. He must have been high on coke when he read them, because I’ve never heard anything that he’s said that didn’t come out of a Cleon Skousen book. If you don’t know who Cleon Skousen is, you should really look it up.
I hope that your straw man argument that “many people” would suggest that the “Constitution is open to reinterpretation” is not supposed to convey any meaning, because it doesn’t mean anything. Seriously, how can you make a statement like that with a straight face? There have been hundreds, or even thousands, of well-researched scholarly books on what the Constitution means. There have been dozens of Supreme Court decisions about what it means. So if you’re one of those people who runs around waving a Constitution and claiming that you know what’s in it, maybe you ought to do a bit of research on your own.
Glenn Beck is an opportunist. He is cashing in on the fear and racism that runs long, wide and deep through the middle of America. I truly hope that if you are one of his followers you can figure that out.
admin
26 Feb 10 at 2:49 pm
Susan, you should seek some help because you can’t hold up your end of the argument with a crutch. You keep changing the subject.
You are the person who made this personal when you told me that my language made me seem less intelligent. Remember?
If not, just look back a couple of posts.
You failed.
You failed to prove that Van Jones is a radical.
You failed to prove that William Ayers is a radical. You also failed to show that there is any connection between Ayers and Obama that would even be called casual.
You failed to answer my replies about Reverend Wright, other than to parrot back one phrase from one sermon he gave.
In shourt, FAIL.
Nobody gives a rat’s ass what you watch, read, or, by now, I would assume, “think”. You’ve proven yourself to be a functional illiterate, in that you cannot follow the stream of a discussion in text. You also cannot help yourself from turning the argument away from the facts and into a stream of personal attacks and innuendo. Do you work for Faux News, by any chance?
Glenn Beck is a serial liar and your characterizations of what he says as “exaggerations” is bullshit. You cannot possibly be a critical thinker and come to the conclusion that Beck is remotely connected with reality. Which of these things is not like the other? Hitler, Mussolini, Pol Pot, Progressives. Did you get “Progressives”? Probably not if you are a Glenn Beckerhead, which you appear to be.
Did you get my goat? Hmmm, let me think about that for a minute. BZZZZT. Another FAIL, Susan. All you have done is managed to make yourself look like an idiot. You said I don’t respect points of view from people who listen to his show. Not exactly, Susan. I don’t respect points of view from people who can’t think critically enough to know that GOP talking points repeated every day by Glenn Beck are not only not true, they’re LUDICROUS.
The left is angry, that’s one thing you picked up on. We’re not just “angry liberals” that can be lumped into a group. Some of us are outraged by the assault on human decency, the Constitution, and the common American citizen presided over by the man you undoubtedly voted for twice. This country is in the midst of a number of crises brought on by decades of center-right and right-wing abuses on the population. If you look outside your window and see people in the street carrying guns, are they going to be liberals or TeaBaggers? Hah! Gotcha! Liberals believe in the processes that have been presented to us, we believe that there needs to be a sea change in our government, but we don’t believe that it’s going to be done through revolution. I have never met any liberal in the last 50 years who has suggested that we need to get into the streets with guns. So where did you pull up that factoid?
Well, you pulled it out from between your generous buttocks, Susan. Again you FAIL, because you project your disinformation over the discussion like Union Carbide in Bhopal. You’re a failure, not only because you’re wrong, but because you’re ignorant. For example, you cite NPR as something you listen to because most people of your right-wingnut bias think that it’s “liberal”. NPR hasn’t been liberal since the middle of Clinton’s first term when Newt Gingrich’s Congress threatened to pull the plug on CPB funding unless they turned right. Of course, you wouldn’t know that because you don’t pay attention, so you just keep spewing that you listen to NPR like it’s some kind of ameliorating explanation as to why you’re not a complete righty asshole. FAIL.
I think I’ve about had it with your bullshit, Susan. I’m tired of having to sift through a shit stew of your babbling personal attacks and lies. In fact, I think liberals are really tired of right wing bullshit in general. We’re tired of 24/7 right wing lie machines funded by an Australian immigrant opportunistic pirate. We’re tired of the greatest weatlh redistribution orchestrated by a government in the history of the world which has pushed 50 per cent of the nation’s wealth up to the top 1% of obscenely wealthy individuals. We’re tired of wars that don’t need to be fought. We’re tired of the GOP trying to use wedge issues to get people to vote against their own best interests. We’re tired of simplistic, moronic, seemingly endless repetition of inaccurate and dangerous lies by people like you.
You’ve got one more failure coming.
You’re banned from this site.
admin
1 Mar 10 at 6:07 am
It’s not the interpretive lies that are telling. It’s the out and out lies that give are the true measure of of one’s integrity. Two examples-Beck stated that he saw Barbara Walters and, I think Whoopee, getting special treatment in seating on the train in New York, which is not allowed.The idiot must have forgotten that he was slated to be on “The View” a week later.The “girls’ damn near had him crying after he admitted he was cordial to Mrs. Walters and was just sensationalizing. He admitted there was no truth to what he reported on his radio show.The next day he then repeated his lie. No interpretation here, he admitted on National TV he made the whole thing up.That is the nth degree of loss of integrity.An aside-Neal Cavuto during a tea party rally in Atlanta was filmed by an independant station asking his assistant how many people were estimated to be at the rally. He was told-about 5000 ( the expected amount). He immediately stood up, and on Fox News, said that there were at least 2 to 3 times that number there. This is simply epgregious lying without apology on straight “news”. How can anyone trust them?
Jim Moore
7 Mar 10 at 10:26 am
The outright lies that Beck spews like a Tommy gun are the ones that I find puzzling. I think he has adopted the hubris of the GOP, namely, that people who listen to him are too stupid to know fact from fiction.
Rush Limbaugh has been making a living in the lying business for years. Beck and Limbaugh are cut from the same cloth; they both demonize liberals, they both keep pushing the GOP to the right, they both lie incessantly, and they both spin up wild conspiracy theories that can’t possibly be true and then they just ignore them when proven false or they don’t happen. It’s show biz, the worst perversion of opinion journalism I’ve ever seen. And I lived during Dr. Carl McIntyre’s and listened to his radio show.
In my opinion, the fix to all of this lying and smearing is to reinstate the Fairness Doctrine. I would like to see a version where anyone who is attacked by some media personality would have the legal right to have equal time to defend themselves at no cost to them. I believe this would be great entertainment and it would keep these gum-flapping bastards honest.
Thanks for the comment.
-Wexler
admin
7 Mar 10 at 3:27 pm
Thanks for all you do! The once or twice I was awestruck enough to watch Glenn Beck, I came to the conclusion that he actually believes what he said. To you paranoid tea-bagger types, no I am not a socialist, I believe in the right to keep and bear arms, I am pro-life (although I include access to health care in that view) and have worked for the last 34 years of my life supporting myself and my family. Not everybody who believes those things are whack-job tea baggers, nor are those of us who are able to identify Glenn Beck as a blow hard fear monger socialists.
My father in law claims that 70% of car dealers forced to close were Republican. I argued that the significance of that statistic can only be validated or disproved if we know how many car dealers were republican and how many democrat prior to the dealership closings. This just sounds like a Glenn Beck theory, and they are riveted to the False News Network. Do you have any information here?
Cheryl
13 Mar 10 at 12:21 am