We are happy to announce that a related website has just been launched by William W. Wexler, who feels well enough to rejoin the fray for the 2012 election.

Wexler, as you may remember, founded www.stopdubya.com (which is a total mess at the moment) and this site, and has now decided to throw some energy into debunking Beck’s fellow Mormon, Mitt Romney.

In this process you will begin to see the connection between Beck’s sudden shift from economic and political conspiracy theories to reconciling the Mormon cult with the Republican Christian Fundamentalists. That’s what 8/28 was all about. The platform was filled with Christian speakers, and GOP wannabes, but there were no Mormons there besides Beck.

Now that Mitt Romney has made the obligatory yet incendiary appearance at Liberty University for the Commencement speech, he is on his way to following the path to somehow trick Christians into voting for a Mormon cultist.

Not on our watch. Quinn and I will keep this site updated and we will also be publishing hard-hitting, no-nonsense truth about how Mitt Romney was the worst possible choice the GOP could have made for the head of their ticket.

Please stop by and watch our new site grow.

www.romneyvspeople.com

Thanks and see you there!

Wexler

Not just about fresh-faced boys and a great choir

The Czars had a great choir, too.

I think the first exposure or awareness I had to the Mormons was just past the midpoint of the last century. My grandfather, retired from his job as county assessor, had taken a part-time job doing accounting work at a gas station in our little town. Our family didn’t have much money in those days so Gramps picked up a Christmas LP with a variety of artists singing Christmas carols. I think it was from Firestone tires and I think I may even still have it somewhere among my 1500 albums. If my memory serves me correctly, the Mormon Tabernacle Choir sang ‘Adestes Fedeles’ (O Come All Ye Faithful). We listened to that record hundreds of times over the years.

So, growing up, the only thing I knew about the Mormons was that they had a great choir. We didn’t have a Mormon church in our city, and we were near the end of the line, so to speak, so perhaps the Mormons hadn’t gotten around to mapping out our community yet. If they ever showed up at our door, they never got through it. During this period of my life, I was very much interested in religion and was even considering a career as a pastor at one point, which amuses me now given my agnostic/atheist beliefs. During my second year of college, there was a Mormon in our dorm who happily gave me a copy of the Book of Mormon, which I prized and kept near my Bible and Satanic Bible. Back in those days, people used to sit around and have ‘bull sessions’ about various topics, and religion was a favorite as it always included plenty of semi-informed speculation about what this or that might mean.

It's no use trying to hide from them, they'll catch up with you anywhere you go.

Flash forward to a new century, in a quiet town in a quiet state. Our doorbell rang about every 6 months and my wife would coldly yet politely shag the two young ‘elder’ Mormon lads who rang it down the road. This happened several times before I decided to let them in, sit them down and give them hell, and THEN shag them down the road once and for all. They sat down and we chatted about normal stuff for a while and during that conversation I realized that I really liked these fresh-faced kids. They reminded me of me when I was about their age, earnestly and eagerly wanting to talk about their religious beliefs and proselytize if the opportunity presented itself. (Of course, in my day, I was all about LSD, not LDS). We began to talk about religion, and I gave them fair warning that we both have religious beliefs (my wife is Catholic) and on we went. There was slight pressure in the conversation towards the Mormon beliefs but it was subtle and respectful. After a while they said they had to go but they wanted to pray for me first. I thought that was sweet. I invited them to come back any time, adding that they were welcome to come in out of the rain or cold, to warm up, have some water, use the bathroom, or whatever.

I think we saw that pair of young men two more times. One of them was from Portland, Oregon, and his mission was almost over. A second pair came in once, and after that we haven’t seen any more Mormon missionaries. From what I know now, I expect that records of each contact were carefully noted and reported. I think we have used all of our allotted opportunities to become Mormons.

I wouldn’t have ever even thought of Mormons again, possibly, if it wasn’t for Glenn Beck. That would have been unfortunate, because despite being a political junkie I may have never bothered to notice them because they operate in such secrecy. If you’re not actually looking for Mormon political actions and history you won’t see it because they rarely allow themselves to be seen. That is, unless you’re one of the people who they screw, as they did in to LGBTs in California and Maine by pumping millions of dollars into a hate-filled smear campaign against the civil right of marriage for all. This one I find to be rather interesting given the role of the government in ending polygamy in 1890 and the struggle that the Mormons fought for 50 years to hold to it.

Left Coast cartoon sums it up pretty well.

A quick side note. I got an email just yesterday from Fred Karger of Californians Against Hate. The Mormons have come out publicly supporting Salt Lake City’s proposed ordinance which prohibits discrimination against LGBTs regarding employment and housing. The ordinance also protects those with disabilities. Fred is hopeful that this is an opening step in a LDS church that is more open to granting civil rights to LGBTs. I take a more cynical view. In the last days before the November 3^rd election in which Maine overturned their LGBT marriage law, there was a dispute between gay LGBT advocates and NOM (National Organization for Marriage) which pumped $1.6 million into overturning the marriage law in Maine. A federal court ruled that NOM must disclose its donors under Maine law; they still haven’t complied with the ruling and I believe that this latest news from the Mormons ‘supporting’ LGBT civil rights in Utah is pure PR. They know that they are about to be cold-busted in Maine as the primary donor to NOM’s campaign.

Mormon History: steeped in blood, fraud, racism, sexism and lawlessness

This section is not intended to be comprehensive nor is it a mini-course in comparative religion. The history of all religions could be written in the blood spilled by their adherents. In any religion there is an ‘in’ group and an ‘out’ group defined by a dogmatic set of rules and codes that the in group follows and the out group doesn’t. The history of early Christianity has been filtered through the ages, but Mormon history is relatively recent so we have modern accounts dating back to its very beginnings.

Fraud

This guy was a fraud, a cheat, a murderer, a charlatan, a polygamist, oh, and by the way, the founder of the Mormon church.

The Mormon faith is founded on documents supposedly found by Joseph Smith, a self-proclaimed ‘Glass looker’ (also known as ‘money digger’) who said he could see things that other people couldn’t see by looking into a glass or special stone. One of the things he looked for was buried treasure, which explains why he never had any money. In the 1820s phonies like Smith were commonplace. In 1826 Smith was hired by Josiah Stowell in New York to find what he thought was a Spanish treasure buried on his farm. Smith spent a month on the farm living off of his host’s hospitality, and came up empty handed. After that small fiasco Smith was brought up on charges by those close to Stowell; Arad Stowell, Josiah’s son, was one who testified at the trial that he had observed Smith’s operations and that he was a fraud. Smith was convicted of Disturbing the Peace. (An odd charge, I think).

There has been a lot of controversy about the Book of Mormon’s origins, authenticity, and even plagiarism. The story is that Joseph Smith was out money digging and was guided to a buried box of golden plates which were there under the protection of the angel named ‘Moroni’. This find supposedly took place September 22, 1823, near Manchester, New York. This Moroni was a “rules person”, and Smith was not allowed to have the plates until he followed a bunch of rules, including coming back to them every year for 4 years. Smith finally got the plates but was not allowed to show them to anyone (of course). The plates were written in a language Smith referred to as ‘reformed Egyptian’, which is a language that no linguist has ever seen. It has no trace of existence on this planet. Smith began translating the plates by looking at his seer stone in the bottom of his inverted stovepipe hat, dictating the English to several people who took turns writing it down.

The Golden Plates which contained the Book of Mormon written in "reformed Egyptian". Gimme a break.

Since there are but a few eyewitness accounts of the plates, and since the accounts of what they actually looked like don’t match, there is not even any usable circumstantial evidence that proves they existed. Therefore the Mormons accept their existence and the authenticity of their translation as an article of faith. Those of us who don’t believe in magic tricks would be more easily convinced if there was any tangible evidence besides a book that is full of contradictions, inaccuracies, and even some suspected plagiarism. Passages from the Book of Mormon are almost identical to passages in the KJV of the Bible, which is odd because the plates were alleged to be 1100 years old and therefore predate the King James Bible, which was written in 1611, creating a compelling point for calling the golden plates story nothing more than hokum and charlatanism.

There is another book of rules called the ‘Doctrines and Covenants’, originally published in 1833 as the ‘Book of Commandments’. In 1834 the book was pared down to what were considered the most significant ‘revelations’. There was another version printed in 1876 contains disputed material attributed by some as revelations of Joseph Smith. There are about 100 revelations and lectures in it. So here’s another opportunity for FRAUD.

If a church claims that one of its bedrock doctrines is the word of God through revelation, and that God speaks directly through the Apostles, then it’s fraudulent when the church changes its dogma as a matter of convenience. It provides a stark example of how the so-called God-given code is nothing more than a phony rule somebody made up that worked out for them at the time but became uncomfortable or inconvenient so it gets changed. This is not a ‘revelation’ of God’s will, it’s a cynical game of opportunism played by the church Leadership.

About Face on Polygamy

In the world of Mormonism, men have needs, too many to be met by a single wife.

Note: the information regarding Mormon polygamy below is largely sourced from what is considered to be an authoritative paper titled ‘LDS Church Authority and new Plural Marriages, 1890-1904 written by D. Michael Quinn. Quinn actually ran this by Mormon President Gordon Hinckley before publishing it. It’s available at http://www.lds-mormon.com/quinn_polygamy.shtml but I get spooky popups from the site, I will just warn you in advance.

The Mormons have taken a dogmatic U-turn at least twice. The first example occurred in 1890 when they suddenly renounced polygamy at the same time that Utah was being held up from statehood over the polygamy issue. The church leadership had been fighting a losing battle with various state and local governments over this issue since the church formed in 1830. They were hounded out of New York, Ohio, Missouri, and Illinois where Joe Smith was killed while in protective custody in Carthage. (Accounts say he killed two of his assailants with a pistol before they killed him). Brigham Young move the church to Utah starting in 1847 to avoid persecution for polygamy and other heresies.

It wasn’t until 1852 that the Mormons made official what was already known by every community within they had lived, namely that they practiced plural marriages. In February 1851, Mormon President Brigham Young announced to a meeting of the Utah territorial legislature that he had more than one wife. Then in August 1852, Young announced that ‘celestial marriage’ was a doctrine of the church.

The Mormon church and its leadership were willing to break local laws, lie to authorities, and even develop the posture that truth was relative, not absolute in order to hold on to polygamy. In 1890, a document called the ’1890 Manifesto’ (Czary, eh, Glenn?) surfaced which declared an end to polygamy but muddied the waters with a whole big lot of controversy as to its origins, its meaning, its scope of authority, and place in the church’s hierarchy of dogma. Was it a revelation? Was it part of the D&C?

The short answer is that there is no short answer. The US Supreme Court had just upheld anti-bigamy laws in 1879. The Mormon leadership was on the run in Mexico. Anti-Mormon forces in Utah were gaining more control; Mormons were denied voting rights and barred from public office. Church property was being seized. The church was in turmoil and confusion for decades over this issue. So- zing! Just declare the sacrament that is central to the faith, the practice that is the life of practicing Mormons, to be null and void! Afterwards, persecution tapers off, Mormons regain control of Utah, which becomes a state, and the rest is history.

Another U-Turn of Convenience: Wassup, bro?

For 150 years, the Mormons taught that all blacks are cursed by God. This is just a plain, ugly fact. It is documented in the D&C. It is reflected in church policies, and their official’s public statements. This is well-documented at the following link http://www.christiandefense.org/mor_black.htm where specific quotations from the Book of Mormon, the D&C, and church leadership spanning those 150 years can be found. The racial prejudice was founded on their interpretation of the Bible, no less, saying that all black people were descended from Cain and therefore were not only inferior beings but were also cursed by God to live lives of suffering and servitude.

Yo, my new brother, was HAAPENIN, come on in, ya'll are cursed but you know how to keep our shoes SHINED

But- wait! In case of emergency, break dogma. For 150 years the Mormons refused to allow black men into ‘the Priesthood’. But in 1978 the pressure mounted on the church to a point where the Apostles had another convenient ‘revelation’. It might have had something to do with Stanford University’s declaration that they were banning football games with BYU because of racism. Maybe it was the pending NAACP lawsuit filed on behalf of Byron Marchant, a black man denied the position of Scoutmaster because the church required all Scoutmasters to be members of ‘the Priesthood’. For whatever reason, there was another ‘revelation’ that blacks could now be received into ‘the Priesthood’. Strangely, the text of the ‘revelation’ has never actually been revealed. It’s only been included as an ‘Official Declaration’ in the D&C, which states that the ‘revelation’ occurred. However, although the policy has changed, the idea that black people are inferior and cursed has NOT changed. This dichotomy of practice vs dogma is a perfect example of the church adapting itself to the environment.

Please note carefully: although the church institutionalized racism, this is NOT a universally-accepted doctrine of all Mormons nor has it been over the last 150 years. Many Mormons have been outspoken challengers of this policy and have championed black civil rights.

Blood on the sand, blood on their hands

In 1857, the Mormons in Utah were in a state of rebellion against the US government over the polygamy issue and others as well. The Mormons had formed a militia named the Nauvoo Legion and loudly claimed that they would defend Utah from any invading force. President Buchanan was incensed by this and ordered a force of 2,500 regular army to Utah to restore order.

About 140 human beings, men, women, and children were murdered in cold blood at Mountain Meadows on 9/11/1857. Maybe Glenn Beck should start a 9/12 Project about THAT.

Against this backdrop, a wagon train originating from Arkansas called the Fancher-Baker party passed into Utah territory on its way to Oregon. Church leaders wanted to off the interlopers, but they didn’t want to have to take responsibility for killing them. Their Big Plan? They dressed up like Indians. WTF? The initial attack became a siege as the wagon train put up a fight. After some period of time, the Mormons persuaded the wagon train to surrender. What happened next was horrible.

On September 11, 1857, at Mountain Meadows, the members of the wagon train surrendered to the Mormons. Every man, woman, and child that was deemed old enough to recount what happened was executed in cold blood. The men were shot by the Mormons. The women and children were killed by Piaute Indians who were assisting in the siege. Approximately 18 children were spared execution but lost their families and were assimilated into the Mormon whack factory. All the possessions of the wagon train were stolen, including 800 head of cattle.

Brigham Young’s role in the slaughter of humans like animals is controversial. But we know a few things. First, he stated ‘If any miserable scoundrels come here, cut their throats‘ during a sermon he delivered under the subject ‘Red hot blood atonement’. Second, he orchestrated a coverup to blame the murder on the Indians. There is a theory that Young ordered the massacre personally, sending a message to the militia, ‘Brethren, do your duty.’

A woman is a wondrous thing to own

Ah, the good old days, when men were men and women knew their place.

The Mormon church is designed by men to serve men and keep women subordinate. Women are excluded from holding positions of authority but all women are subservient to that authority. Women are not only subordinate in this life, but in the Mormon afterlife as well where they will fulfill their ‘equal power’ by spitting out babies like a Tommy gun.

The male chauvinism of the Mormon church is codified by statements of Leadership and teaching documents such as ‘The Latter-day Saint Woman – Basic Manual for Women’. In these writings, women are not only ordered to embrace their inferiority to men by affirmation, they are to embrace it spiritually as well. Further, women have no control or say over the vast Mormon fortune; this is the provenance of men alone. Women are required to serve the church when called without pay.

The pervasive integration of Mormon church membership into family life guarantees that women will get no better treatment at home than they do within the church. Women are expected to obey their husbands, serve them, support them, and make babies for them, lots and lots of babies.

Is the Mormon Church a Cult?

Do Mormons worship a false god or even Satan?

I have tried to give a brief overview of events and people who have shaped the Mormons into what they are today. I have not yet addressed some of the dogma that separates them from Christians. The church uses the words ‘Jesus Christ’ in their official name; however, they hold beliefs that the Christian world consider to be heretical, non-Christian, and fraudulent. To make this concise I’m going to just list some of them, as I’m already up to 3000 words for this part of my article and I don’t want you to have to take a whole day to read it. The next 10 points are written from a Christian point of view, which I am not, but know quite a bit about.

Heretical views of the Mormon Church:

1. Mormons believe in polytheism, or multiple Gods. They believe that men can become God in their own universe.
2. Mormons believe that God is flesh and bones, just like humans.
3. Mormons believe that God is married and that all spirits of all people on earth were conceived through sex.
4. Mormons believe in polygamy, even though they have a ‘revelation’ to stop practicing it.
5. Mormons believe that God has evolved.
6. Mormons believe that Jesus is the ‘spirit brother’ of Satan and was not born of the Holy Spirit and Mary, but instead through physical incest.
7. Since 1830 the Book of Mormon, supposedly the scripture, has been changed 4000 times.
8. You will never see a cross, the symbol of Christianity, in a Mormon temple.
9. There is no corroboration with the Book of Mormon in history, archaeology, geography, linguistics, or anthropology.
10. The Bible has little use in the Mormon worship service and usually only appears in the temple for Easter and Christmas.

I thought it might be useful to take a quick trip through to the characteristics of cults. Here’s a ‘checklist’ I found that covers a lot of what I have been thinking about since I got interested in this topic.

Characteristics Associated with Cultic Groups – Revised

Janja Lalich, Ph.D. & Michael D. Langone, Ph.D.

http://www.csj.org/infoserv_cult101/checklis.htm

Concerted efforts at influence and control lie at the core of cultic groups, programs, and relationships. Many members, former members, and supporters of cults are not fully aware of the extent to which members may have been manipulated, exploited, even abused. The following list of social-structural, social-psychological, and interpersonal behavioral patterns commonly found in cultic environments may be helpful in assessing a particular group or relationship.

Compare these patterns to the situation you were in (or in which you, a family member, or friend is currently involved). This list may help you determine if there is cause for concern. Bear in mind that this list is not meant to be a ‘cult scale’ or a definitive checklist to determine if a specific group is a cult. This is not so much a diagnostic instrument as it is an analytical tool.

‪ * The group displays excessively zealous and unquestioning commitment to its leader and (whether he is alive or dead) regards his belief system, ideology, and practices as the Truth, as law.

‪* Questioning, doubt, and dissent are discouraged or even punished.

‪* Mind-altering practices (such as meditation, chanting, speaking in tongues, denunciation sessions, and debilitating work routines) are used in excess and serve to suppress doubts about the group and its leader(s).

‪

Now we know. Briefs, sort of. What you have to wear to temple, under what you have to wear to temple.

* The leadership dictates, sometimes in great detail, how members should think, act, and feel (for example, members must get permission to date, change jobs, marry—or leaders prescribe what types of clothes to wear, where to live, whether or not to have children, how to discipline children, and so forth).

‪* The group is elitist, claiming a special, exalted status for itself, its leader(s) and members (for example, the leader is considered the Messiah, a special being, an avatar—or the group and/or the leader is on a special mission to save humanity).

‪* The group has a polarized us-versus-them mentality, which may cause conflict with the wider society.

‪* The leader is not accountable to any authorities (unlike, for example, teachers, military commanders or ministers, priests, monks, and rabbis of mainstream religious denominations).

‪* The group teaches or implies that its supposedly exalted ends justify whatever means it deems necessary. This may result in members’ participating in behaviors or activities they would have considered reprehensible or unethical before joining the group (for example, lying to family or friends, or collecting money for bogus charities).

‪* The leadership induces feelings of shame and/or guilt iin order to influence and/or control members. Often, this is done through peer pressure and subtle forms of persuasion.

‪* Subservience to the leader or group requires members to cut ties with family and friends, and radically alter the personal goals and activities they had before joining the group.

‪* The group is preoccupied with bringing in new members.

‪* The group is preoccupied with making money.

‪* Members are expected to devote inordinate amounts of time to the group and group-related activities.

‪* Members are encouraged or required to live and/or socialize only with other group members.

‪* The most loyal members (the ‘true believers’) feel there can be no life outside the context of the group. They believe there is no other way to be, and often fear reprisals to themselves or others if they leave (or even consider leaving) the group.

What it all boils down to is control. If you belong to an organization that controls a large part of your life, including the way you behave and the way you think, you may be a member of a cult. By my reckoning, the Mormons fit the definition “almost all of the above”. They control you, and if you try to get away from them they will make your life miserable.

Edit added 9/3/10… if you or someone you love is trying to escape from Mormonism and need some help, it’s available online. Please visit http://www.exmormon.org/.

NEXT: Glenn Beck, Mormon convert and de facto Teaparty Minister of Propaganda

Prologue

I'm trying, but he has to ask some rational ones now and again

The Teaparty movement is composed of a diverse collection of groups that focus some of their energy in the same direction. If you ask teabaggers what defines the group you will get a variety of responses mostly centered around a primitive view of the Constitution, a few Libertarian ideas regarding taxes and specific policy issues (such as the stimulus package, 2nd Amendment, health insurance reform, GM bailout, AIDS research, unemployment benefits, etc., etc.), strong nationalism and anti-immigrant loathing, anti-abortion, homophobia, white-is-right on any issue regarding race, anti-liberalism, anti-communism/socialism, and a Christian theocratic view of governance that is heavily weighted towards so-called “Bible churches” which have no qualms about claiming control over their congregations’ lives based on their literal and bizarre interpretations of the Bible.

Anger is a major center of gravity that pulls teabaggers together. Anger against the “liberal media” and Democratic Party runs deep and wild. Anger against Muslims and other foreigners in places such as “Old Europe” has been stoked for years by the Bush Administration and still thrives today. Right wing anger, racial and social prejudice, jingoism and American Exceptionalism, populism, and greed are the red meat of radio gasbags like Rush Limbaugh, who spew sarcastic hate speech, conspiracy theories, and outright lies by the hour.

Until Glenn Beck came along, media shock jocks took very few excursions past the boundaries of the GOP talking points. However, since the 2008 election in which Americans elected Barack Hussein Obama as President, the 24 hour right wing political babble has caught up with the GOP. (Is this possibly the verbal equivalent of “How many monkeys with how many typewriters…? I will have to explore that in a future post). Glenn Beck has determined that Democrats and liberalism do not comprise the entire problem; the GOP is also part of it. His redux is that the GOP has become too liberal, and that’s why America now has a Black Nationalist President who is busily hatching a steady stream of socialist-fascist plots to get reparations for slavery, among other things. Barack Obama didn’t win the election, the GOP lost it. Beck, along with a few disgraced and rejected GOPERs including Sarah Palin, Rick Santorum, and Dick Armey, are trying to build a 3rd party movement out of the teabaggers and New York’s 23rd Congressional district became the test tube for their experiment. In a confused and hurried attempt to thrust a lame, unknown, and unqualified candidate into the race, they botched it and now a seat that should have been a GOP gimme is occupied by a Democrat. I wrote about that righty fiasco at length last week.

How PC is too PC?

Religion is a delicate topic among liberals but it’s newsworthy due to its powerful influence over the politics of the groups that are involved. But before I dig into the topic, I would like to say a few words to liberals.

Modern liberalism has embraced many ideas and trends from pop culture over the last 3 decades. This has been a mixed blessing, as there have been numerous adoptions of over-simplified notions derived from larger initiatives such as ending institutionalized prejudice. As is normal in human nature, we overreact when making corrections and then have to come back the other way. One group of behaviors where we’ve overreacted is collectively named “Political Correctness”, or “PC” for short, a name that has itself become a focus for derision from all 180 degrees of the political scale. This brings me back to the topic at hand, which is Mormonism, Glenn Beck’s religion.

To clarify my vantage point, my own religious beliefs waffle between atheism and agnosticism, so any criticism of religion you hear from me is definitely not prejudicial because I regard all religions to be equal. Equally wrong, that is, in the fundamental claim they all make which is to know the unknowable. However, the “PC” nature of liberals has allowed the Mormons to sneak under the radar, as criticism of a religious group is considered to be intolerance.

I don’t wish to discuss the Mormon belief system except as to how it relates to politics. The plain fact is that the LDS church contains a political activist group that has an agenda and is successfully pushing it through the political system. Two blatant examples of this are the special ballot initiatives in California and Maine, where millions of dollars came from the Mormon front group NOM (National Organization for Marriage) which overturned equal marriage rights for LGBTs, and also the previously mentioned election in NY 23rd, where NOM was a major force against Dede Scozzafava.

How to build a place of worship when money is no object

Mormons are quick to deny that their church has any political affiliation, but the facts say otherwise. I have tried and failed to get a statement about Glenn Beck from the Church headquarters in Salt Lake City. I did get through 3 layers of the organization to a phone that is apparently never answered, at least not when I’m calling it. The best I could get was someone who refused to be quoted by name who told me that each LDS member has free will to do whatever they want as long as they attempt to follow church doctrines. I pointed out that Glenn Beck has called the President a racist, fantasized about killing Michael Moore and Nancy Pelosi, and lies on a continuing basis about matters that are important to the nation. The response was dogmatic: Any statement regarding Glenn Beck would have to come from “the Leadership” (which means The President and The Apostles, who speak to and for God on earth). Apparently God must think Beck is OK, as they haven’t made any attempt to distance themselves from his antics. This doesn’t mean that Mormons universally support Beck. On one chat board, a courageous Mormon fellow wrote an article under the subject line “Glenn Beck An Embarrassment To Mormons—Perpetuates Harmful, Untrue Stereotypes”. Wow, that is speaking to power, can I get an “Amen!?”

My point here is that we should not regard the Mormon church as ONLY a religious organization. They are more than that, the church is functionally a political activist group. The Mormons would be of little interest to me other than their cult-ish beliefs and secrecy were it not for the fact that they are an international organization with a political agenda and $billions if not $trillions in assets to push it.

NEXT: Not just about fresh-faced boys and a great choir